Quote:
Originally Posted by yqz7
Eh… wut? Reflect on oneself if he is not able to see or touch? Wow this is new low.
The thing is, if a customer has a bad record it is ok if the girl is selective and do not want to accept the business in the first place.
But if you accept the business then decide it is ok to shortchange your offerings because he has a bad record, or you don’t like his face etc I think this should not be condoned.
It is a transaction, you have expectations of the bare minimum which is advertised. Since when we allow the girls to be selective even for the bare minimum. Cannot touch I understand some girls are sensitive and do not like it. I accept it but maybe choose not to visit next time if I cannot live with it. All good.
But if cannot see topless really like what some say, I might as well go to clean joint.
In those cases then I think the bros should just pay like $60-70 to the girl? For providing sub par massage that’s probably the market rate.
Ok to add on after I see her ad, apparently there is no mention of topless in the ad. So means she is entitled to not show it if she wants. Then the bros who still go ahead and book for $110… wow…
|
Actually, I just looked at her ad again after you mentioned that..
Listed as 32B boobs... Wah lao. Means it's 30A IRL. Forget it then, even if strip also nothing to see or touch. LOL!